\relax 
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToFields[1]{}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToCoFields[2]{}
\bibstyle{plainnat}
\citation{WHO2020}
\citation{Cohen2017}
\citation{Huang2019}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}{section.1}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{Huang2019}
\citation{Li2021}
\citation{Guo2017}
\citation{Howard2019}
\citation{Guo2017}
\citation{Selvaraju2017}
\citation{Sandler2018}
\citation{Howard2019}
\citation{Narasimhan2002}
\citation{He2009}
\citation{Li2017Reside}
\citation{Wang2023_SurveillanceAQ}
\citation{Kow2022_JEnvMan}
\citation{Raissi2019}
\citation{Hsieh2023_HLE}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Related Work}{3}{section.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Lightweight CNNs for Resource-Constrained Vision}{3}{subsection.2.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Haze and Air-Quality Estimation from Images}{3}{subsection.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML)}{3}{subsection.2.3}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{Guo2017}
\citation{Li2017Reside}
\citation{Chen2021HVAQ}
\citation{SAPID2024}
\citation{QuioneroCandela2009}
\citation{Sun2016DeepCORAL}
\citation{Ganin2016DANN}
\citation{Wang2018SurveyUDA}
\citation{Wilson2020SurveyUDA}
\citation{Wang2021TENT}
\citation{Liang2020SHOT}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}Calibration and Post-hoc Temperature Scaling}{4}{subsection.2.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.5}Datasets for Image-based Air Quality and Haze}{4}{subsection.2.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.6}Domain Shift, Cross-Region Generalization, and Test-Time Adaptation}{4}{subsection.2.6}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{Howard2019}
\citation{Guo2017}
\citation{Wang2021TENT}
\citation{Liang2020SHOT}
\citation{Wilson2020SurveyUDA}
\citation{SAPID2024}
\citation{SAPID2024}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.7}Survey Synthesis and Research Gap}{5}{subsection.2.7}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Research Methodology}{5}{section.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:method}{{3}{5}{Research Methodology}{section.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Dataset}{5}{subsection.3.1}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{Howard2019}
\citation{Narasimhan2002}
\citation{He2009}
\citation{Guo2017}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Baseline Model: MobileNetV3-Small}{6}{subsection.3.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Physics-Informed Model}{6}{subsection.3.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Architecture overview (\emph  {what} components exist): MobileNetV3 backbone with a physics-cues branch (used at training time) and inference-time calibration and TTA. No training logic is shown here.}}{7}{figure.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:framework_overview}{{1}{7}{Architecture overview (\emph {what} components exist): MobileNetV3 backbone with a physics-cues branch (used at training time) and inference-time calibration and TTA. No training logic is shown here}{figure.1}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces End-to-end pipeline (\emph  {how} it runs): training optimizes $\mathcal  L_{\mathrm  {CE}}$ and $\mathcal  L_{\mathrm  {physics}}$ to form $\mathcal  L_{\mathrm  {total}}$; inference applies TTA and temperature scaling for calibrated predictions.}}{7}{figure.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:training_inference_pipeline}{{2}{7}{End-to-end pipeline (\emph {how} it runs): training optimizes $\mathcal L_{\mathrm {CE}}$ and $\mathcal L_{\mathrm {physics}}$ to form $\mathcal L_{\mathrm {total}}$; inference applies TTA and temperature scaling for calibrated predictions}{figure.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Calibration and Robustness}{7}{subsection.3.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Training Setup}{7}{subsection.3.5}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{Guo2017}
\citation{Selvaraju2017}
\citation{Howard2019}
\citation{SAPID2024}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Physics-informed pairwise ranking: contrast $C$ and sharpness $S$ decrease with severity, while dark channel $D$ increases. Violations incur a hinge penalty (margin $\delta $).}}{8}{figure.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:physics_loss_tikz}{{3}{8}{Physics-informed pairwise ranking: contrast $C$ and sharpness $S$ decrease with severity, while dark channel $D$ increases. Violations incur a hinge penalty (margin $\delta $)}{figure.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.6}Evaluation Metrics}{8}{subsection.3.6}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Experimental Setup}{8}{section.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:setup}{{4}{8}{Experimental Setup}{section.4}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Hardware and Software Environment}{8}{subsection.4.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Data Splits}{8}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{Guo2017}
\citation{Selvaraju2017}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Preprocessing and Augmentation}{9}{subsection.4.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Training Configuration}{9}{subsection.4.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Evaluation Protocol}{9}{subsection.4.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.6}Baselines and Comparisons}{9}{subsection.4.6}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Class distribution of SAPID dataset across five AQI categories: Good, Moderate, USG, Unhealthy, Very Unhealthy.}}{10}{figure.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:dataset_dist}{{4}{10}{Class distribution of SAPID dataset across five AQI categories: Good, Moderate, USG, Unhealthy, Very Unhealthy}{figure.4}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Baseline results: (a) confusion matrix shows strong performance on major classes but confusion in minority categories; (b) PR curves reveal lower average precision for ``Very Unhealthy''.}}{10}{figure.5}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:baseline_results}{{5}{10}{Baseline results: (a) confusion matrix shows strong performance on major classes but confusion in minority categories; (b) PR curves reveal lower average precision for ``Very Unhealthy''}{figure.5}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Results and Discussion}{10}{section.5}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:results}{{5}{10}{Results and Discussion}{section.5}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Dataset Distribution}{10}{subsection.5.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Baseline Performance}{10}{subsection.5.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Confusion matrices comparing Baseline, Physics v2, and Ensemble models. Physics-informed regularization improves rare-class recognition, particularly USG and Very Unhealthy.}}{11}{figure.6}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:physics_results}{{6}{11}{Confusion matrices comparing Baseline, Physics v2, and Ensemble models. Physics-informed regularization improves rare-class recognition, particularly USG and Very Unhealthy}{figure.6}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Boxplots of physics features (contrast, sharpness, dark channel prior) across predicted classes. Monotonic trends confirm physical interpretability of the model.}}{11}{figure.7}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:physics_features}{{7}{11}{Boxplots of physics features (contrast, sharpness, dark channel prior) across predicted classes. Monotonic trends confirm physical interpretability of the model}{figure.7}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Physics-Informed Model Improvements}{11}{subsection.5.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}Physics-Feature Trends}{11}{subsection.5.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.5}Grad-CAM Interpretability}{11}{subsection.5.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.6}Calibration and Reliability}{11}{subsection.5.6}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Grad-CAM visualizations: the model focuses on haze-dense regions, providing interpretability in smog-level classification.}}{12}{figure.8}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:gradcam}{{8}{12}{Grad-CAM visualizations: the model focuses on haze-dense regions, providing interpretability in smog-level classification}{figure.8}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Reliability diagram for Physics v2 + temperature scaling. The model achieves ECE=0.071, indicating well-calibrated confidence.}}{12}{figure.9}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:reliability}{{9}{12}{Reliability diagram for Physics v2 + temperature scaling. The model achieves ECE=0.071, indicating well-calibrated confidence}{figure.9}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Efficiency comparison between baseline and Physics v2 models. Both are lightweight and real-time on CPU hardware.}}{13}{table.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:efficiency}{{1}{13}{Efficiency comparison between baseline and Physics v2 models. Both are lightweight and real-time on CPU hardware}{table.1}{}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Final results summary on SAPID test set. Physics v2 with calibration achieves the best accuracy and macro-F1.}}{13}{table.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:final_results}{{2}{13}{Final results summary on SAPID test set. Physics v2 with calibration achieves the best accuracy and macro-F1}{table.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.7}Efficiency Analysis}{13}{subsection.5.7}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.8}Final Results Summary}{13}{subsection.5.8}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusion and Future Work}{13}{section.6}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:conclusion}{{6}{13}{Conclusion and Future Work}{section.6}{}}
\citation{Wang2021TENT}
\citation{Liang2020SHOT}
\bibdata{egbib}
\gdef \BMVA@LastPage{14}
\gdef \@abspage@last{14}
