Biologically plausible boundary detection

Arash Akbarinia and Alejandro Parraga

Abstract

Edges are key components of any visual scene to the extent that we can recognise objects merely by their silhouettes. The human visual system captures edge information through neurons in the visual cortex that are sensitive to both intensity discontinuities and particular orientations. The "classical approach" assumes that these cells are only responsive to the stimulus present within their receptive fields, however, recent studies demonstrate that surrounding regions and inter-areal feedback connections influence their responses significantly. In this work we propose a biologically-inspired edge detection model in which orientation selective neurons are represented through the first derivative of a Gaussian function resembling double-opponent cells in the primary visual cortex (V1). In our model we account for four kinds of surround, i.e. full, far, iso- and orthogonal-orientation, whose contributions are contrast-dependant. The output signal from V1 is pooled in its perpendicular direction by larger V2 neurons employing a contrast-variant centre-surround kernel. We further introduce a feedback connection from higher-level visual areas to the lower ones. The results of our model on two benchmark datasets show a big improvement compared to the current non-learning and biologically-inspired state-of-the-art algorithms while being competitive to the learning-based methods.

Session

Segmentation

Files

Extended Abstract (PDF, 1M)
Paper (PDF, 2M)

DOI

10.5244/C.30.5
https://dx.doi.org/10.5244/C.30.5

Citation

Bibtex

        @inproceedings{BMVC2016_5,
        	title={Biologically plausible boundary detection},
        	author={Arash Akbarinia and Alejandro Parraga},
        	year={2016},
        	month={September},
        	pages={5.1-5.13},
        	articleno={5},
        	numpages={13},
        	booktitle={Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC)},
        	publisher={BMVA Press},
        	editor={Richard C. Wilson, Edwin R. Hancock and William A. P. Smith},
        	doi={10.5244/C.30.5},
        	isbn={1-901725-59-6},
        	url={https://dx.doi.org/10.5244/C.30.5}
        }